Buy fairplay24.eu ?

Products related to Partisanship:


  • The Power of Partisanship
    The Power of Partisanship

    In The Power of Partisanship, Joshua J. Dyck and Shanna Pearson-Merkowitz argue that the growth in partisan polarization in the United States, and the resulting negativity voters feel towards their respective opposition party, has far-reaching effects on how Americans behave both inside and outside the realm of politics.In fact, no area of social life in the United States is safe from partisan influence.As a result of changes in the media landscape and decades of political polarization, voters are stronger partisans than in the past and are more likely to view the opposition party with a combination of confusion, disdain, and outright hostility.Yet, little of this hostility is grounded in specific policy preferences.Even ideology lacks meaning in the United States: conservative and liberal are what Republicans and Democrats have labeled "conservative" and "liberal."Dyck and Pearson-Merkowitz show how partisanship influences the electorate's support for democratic norms, willingness to engage in risk related to financial and healthcare decisions, interracial interactions, and previously non-political decisions like what we like to eat for dinner.Partisanship prevents people from learning from their interactions with friends or the realities of their neighborhoods, and even makes them oblivious to their own economic hardship.The intensity and pervasiveness of partisanship in politics today has resulted in "political knowledge" becoming an endogenous feature of strong partisanship and a poor proxy for anything but partisan behavior.Dyck and Pearson-Merkowitz present evidence that pure independents are, in fact, very responsive to information because they are not biased by partisan elite cues and important and relevant political information is often local, contextual, and personal.Drawing on a series of original surveys and experiments conducted between 2014 and 2020, Dyck and Pearson-Merkowitz show how the dominance of partisanship as a decision cue has fundamentally transformed our understanding of both political and non-political behavior.

    Price: 18.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £
  • IMF Lending : Partisanship, Punishment, and Protest
    IMF Lending : Partisanship, Punishment, and Protest

    This Element argues that governments allocate adjustment burdens strategically to protect their supporters, imposing adjustment costs upon the supporters of their opponents, who then protest in response.Using large-N micro-level survey data from three world regions and a global survey, it discusses the local political economy of International Monetary Fund (IMF) lending.It finds that opposition supporters in countries under IMF structural adjustment programs (SAP) are more likely to report that the IMF SAP increased economic hardships than government supporters and countries without IMF exposure.In addition, it finds that partisan gaps in IMF SAP evaluations widen in IMF program countries with an above-median number of conditions, suggesting that opposition supporters face heavier adjustment burdens, and that opposition supporters who think SAPs made their lives worse are more likely to protest.This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.

    Price: 49.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £
  • IMF Lending : Partisanship, Punishment, and Protest
    IMF Lending : Partisanship, Punishment, and Protest

    This Element argues that governments allocate adjustment burdens strategically to protect their supporters, imposing adjustment costs upon the supporters of their opponents, who then protest in response.Using large-N micro-level survey data from three world regions and a global survey, it discusses the local political economy of International Monetary Fund (IMF) lending.It finds that opposition supporters in countries under IMF structural adjustment programs (SAP) are more likely to report that the IMF SAP increased economic hardships than government supporters and countries without IMF exposure.In addition, it finds that partisan gaps in IMF SAP evaluations widen in IMF program countries with an above-median number of conditions, suggesting that opposition supporters face heavier adjustment burdens, and that opposition supporters who think SAPs made their lives worse are more likely to protest.This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.

    Price: 17.00 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £
  • Observing Justice : Digital Transparency, Openness and Accountability in Criminal Courts
    Observing Justice : Digital Transparency, Openness and Accountability in Criminal Courts

    This book examines how major but often under-scrutinised legal, social, and technological developments have affected the transparency and accountability of the criminal justice process. Drawing on empirical and evaluative studies, as well as their own research experiences, the authors explore key legal policy issues such as equality of access, remote and virtual courts, justice system data management, and the roles of public and media observers. Highlighting the implications of recent changes for access to justice, offender rehabilitation, and public access to information, the book proposes a framework for open justice which prioritises public legal education and justice system accountability.

    Price: 45.00 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £
  • What is the fear of being embarrassed due to lack of sportsmanship?

    The fear of being embarrassed due to lack of sportsmanship is known as "athazagoraphobia." This fear can stem from a variety of sources, such as a fear of being judged by others, a fear of losing respect or credibility, or a fear of disappointing oneself or others. It can lead individuals to feel anxious or self-conscious in competitive or team sports settings, and may impact their ability to fully engage in the game or activity. Overcoming this fear may involve building confidence, practicing good sportsmanship, and focusing on personal growth rather than external validation.

  • "Equality before, but justice first?"

    "Equality before, but justice first" suggests that while equality is important, it should not come at the expense of justice. This phrase emphasizes the need to address systemic injustices and inequalities in order to achieve true equality. It implies that simply treating everyone the same does not necessarily address the underlying issues of discrimination and oppression. Instead, it calls for prioritizing justice in order to create a more equitable society for all.

  • What is the difference between justice and equality?

    Justice refers to the fair and impartial treatment of individuals based on their actions and circumstances. It involves ensuring that individuals receive what they deserve based on their conduct and the law. On the other hand, equality refers to the state of being equal, especially in status, rights, and opportunities. It focuses on ensuring that everyone has the same access to resources and opportunities, regardless of their background or circumstances. While justice emphasizes fairness and impartiality, equality emphasizes equal treatment and access to resources.

  • Can there be justice and equality at the same time?

    Justice and equality are interconnected concepts, but achieving both at the same time can be challenging. Justice often involves addressing historical and systemic inequalities, while equality aims to ensure fairness and equal opportunities for all. Striking a balance between the two requires addressing underlying power dynamics and creating policies that promote both justice and equality. It is possible to work towards achieving justice and equality simultaneously, but it requires a comprehensive and inclusive approach that addresses the complexities of social, economic, and political systems.

Similar search terms for Partisanship:


  • Disappointed Ninja : A Social, Emotional Children's Book About Good Sportsmanship and Dealing with Disappointment
    Disappointed Ninja : A Social, Emotional Children's Book About Good Sportsmanship and Dealing with Disappointment

    Is your child a sore loser? Does he or she scream or get angry when losing?Disappointment is a natural emotion and while it never feels good, it's not an emotion to avoid. Children with no experience solving life's little setbacks have a much harder time when they're faced with the big ones. When we teach our children to see stumbling blocks as opportunities to improve and grow, we increase their mental toughness.Good sportsmanship is one of the life lessons that children can learn while young.In this story, Disappointed Ninja becomes disappointed and learns how to display good sportsmanship skills:If you lose, don't quit or make up excuses.,Learn from mistakes and try again.,Always give your best.,If someone else makes a mistake, remain encouraging and avoid criticizing.,Show respect for yourself, your team, and the opponent.,Life is tough. But so are you! The new children's book series, Ninja Life Hacks, was developed to help children learn valuable life skills. Fun, pint-size characters in comedic books easy enough for young readers, yet witty enough for adults.The Ninja Life Hacks book series is geared to kids 3-11. Perfect for boys, girls, early readers, primary school students, or toddlers. Excellent resource for counselors, parents, and teachers alike.Collect all the Ninja Life Hacks books and visit the author's profile for fun freebies!

    Price: 17.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £
  • The Politics of the Cross : A Christian Alternative to Partisanship
    The Politics of the Cross : A Christian Alternative to Partisanship


    Price: 21.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £
  • Democratic Partisanship : Party Activism in an Age of Democratic Crises
    Democratic Partisanship : Party Activism in an Age of Democratic Crises

    Explores how democratic norms resonate with party activists, and with what implications for representative governmentCombines normative theories of democratic partisanship and the empirical study of political partiesContributes a novel theoretical framework for the empirical analysis of democratic partisanshipShowcases an innovative and replicable methodology for focus group discussion and analysisDraws on extensive original research conducted in France and Hungary with 117 political party membersStudies x number of political parties including the conservative Fidesz party and socialist MSzP in Hungary and Parti Socialiste (PS) and Union pour un Mouvement populaire (UMP) in FranceIncludes rare testimonies from within Fidesz, Hungary's governing radical right party since 2010Includes 30 graphic visualisations of key differences in the outlooks of participantsPolitical parties are caught in the crossfire of contemporary criticism.Some are accused of being excessively technocratic and removed from citizens' concerns, while others are attacked for their populist discourse and for pandering to the base instincts of constituents.But what ideal of partisanship do we have in mind when we blame parties for the ills of democracy? And how do real-world parties actually compare to this normative ideal?Democratic Partisanship bridges political theory and empirical study to answer these questions.It explores and compares how key democratic norms hailed by political theorists, such as good justification and respect for opponents, resonate with right-wing and left-wing party members in Hungary and France. Focusing on the partisan's perspective, the book explores how and why some party organisations reconcile the most contradictory democratic imperatives while others fail to uphold basic principles.Far from writing-off parties as intrinsically suspect, Democratic Partisanship makes an incisive case for a new partisan ethic in an age of democratic crises.

    Price: 85.00 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £
  • Beyond the Water’s Edge : How Partisanship Corrupts U.S. Foreign Policy
    Beyond the Water’s Edge : How Partisanship Corrupts U.S. Foreign Policy

    Intense partisanship is a familiar part of the contemporary United States, but its consequences do not stop at the country’s borders.The damage now extends to U.S. relations with the rest of the world. Too often, political leaders place their own party’s interest in gaining and keeping power ahead of the national interest. Paul R. Pillar examines how and why partisanship has undermined U.S. foreign policy, especially over the past three decades.Placing present-day discord in historical perspective going back to the beginning of the republic, Beyond the Water’s Edge shows that although the corrupting effects of partisan divisions are not new, past leaders were often able to overcome them.Recent social and political trends and developments including the end of the Cold War, however, have contributed to a surge of corrosive partisanship.Pillar demonstrates that its costs range from the prolongation of war and crisis to the intrusion of foreign influence and the undermining of democracy.He explores the ways other governments respond to inconsistency in U.S. foreign policy, the consequences of domestic division for U.S. global leadership, and how the corruption of American democracy also weakens democracy worldwide.Pillar considers possible remedies but draws the sobering conclusion that entrenched political sectarianism makes their adoption unlikely.Offering insightful analysis of the decline of U.S. foreign relations, Beyond the Water’s Edge is an important book for all readers concerned about the state of the American political system.

    Price: 30.00 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £
  • What is more important to you: freedom, equality, or justice?

    As an AI language model, I don't have personal preferences, but I can provide an analysis. The importance of freedom, equality, and justice can vary depending on the context and individual perspectives. However, all three values are essential for a fair and just society. Freedom allows individuals to express themselves and pursue their goals, while equality ensures that everyone has the same opportunities and rights. Justice is crucial for holding individuals and institutions accountable and ensuring that everyone is treated fairly under the law. Ultimately, a balance of all three values is necessary for a functioning and equitable society.

  • Doesn't the symbol stand for equality or also for justice?

    The symbol of the equal sign is commonly associated with the concept of equality, representing the idea that two quantities are the same or balanced. However, it can also be interpreted as a symbol of justice, as it signifies fairness and impartiality in mathematical equations and logical reasoning. In this sense, the equal sign can be seen as a representation of both equality and justice, embodying the principles of balance and fairness in various contexts.

  • Do justice and equality have anything to do with each other?

    Yes, justice and equality are closely related concepts. In order for justice to be achieved, there must be equality in the treatment of all individuals. This means that everyone should have equal access to rights, opportunities, and resources. Without equality, there can be no true justice, as certain groups or individuals would be unfairly advantaged or disadvantaged. Therefore, justice and equality are interconnected and essential for a fair and just society.

  • Does society need more concerted actions for equality, justice, and health?

    Yes, society does need more concerted actions for equality, justice, and health. In order to create a more fair and inclusive society, it is essential to address systemic inequalities and injustices that exist. By taking collective action and implementing policies that promote equality, justice, and access to healthcare for all individuals, we can work towards creating a more equitable and healthier society for everyone. It is important for individuals, communities, and governments to come together to advocate for and implement changes that prioritize these values.

* All prices are inclusive of VAT and, if applicable, plus shipping costs. The offer information is based on the details provided by the respective shop and is updated through automated processes. Real-time updates do not occur, so deviations can occur in individual cases.